An Overview of Distributed Social Networks

Lately, the violation of privacy policy by Meta (Facebook) has led to many speculations and fear among the common people on the use of social networking sites. The fact that Meta owns most of the major social networking sites made the scenario more frightful. Another instance that questioned the authenticity of the popular social networking sites was during the outbreak of the Covid-19. The absence of content moderation in these platforms led to widespread misinformation. The challenges like censorship, user control, political neutrality, malicious activities, etc., are also widely discussed.

How to build a distributed social network and how to govern it? | by Tim  Bansemer | Coinmonks | Medium

The rise of a concept known as Distributed Social Networks or Federated Social Networks brings in some rays of hope from all the issues created by the social networking platforms. They will be bringing all the values the current social networks lack. Active research and studies are going on around this topic and the possibilities of such a distributed social network are growing with each passing day. There are social networks backed by Blockchain technology. In fact, blockchain is the best technology. It is on this technology that cryptocurrencies are based. Today, the demand for cryptocurrencies has exploded in recent years. Many people are willing to invest and trade cryptocurrencies today. With the availability of online trading platforms like Bitcoins Buyer, trading in these digital currencies is easier. Those who are considering investing in the bitcoin buyer trading platform are supposed to take the test and take user feedback into account before starting with it

Distributed social networks

Distributed social networks are operated on servers that are independently run. They do not depend on centralized servers that are operated by different business organizations. An example of a decentralized social network is Mastodon. The platform uses open-source software and is very similar to Twitter. Steem is also an example of a decentralized social network and it uses a social blockchain for its operation. By making use of blockchain technology, it is easy to store data entries in servers all around the world. This encourages transparency and anyone can view the data on a network.

A Social Network that Would be Perfect for Everyone

Difference between federated social networking and online social networking

The code that the online social networking sites use is the main difference between these two social networking platforms. The code that gives you access to the different online social networking sites like the Meta, is created in a closed method. It will be owned by the company and you will have to follow them to create a profile or go through other profiles and interact with them.

Federated social networking follows a different ecosystem. The software of federated social networking is open-source which allows anybody to download the source code. This code can be used to create their profiles and to interact with other profiles. Developers are working on a common language for the federated social networking profiles where all of them can interact with one another.

Another notable difference is that the federated social networks allow you to choose from a wide range of profile providers just like how you choose from different email service providers. You can even create your server and offer a social networking profile on your own.

Final Thoughts

Social networking sites are growing in a position to control all the user information, which is dangerous. Distributed social networks, on the other hand, take back the control from the online social networking sites and give it back to the individual users. Social networks are widely used by casino owners to attract their customers through various deals and offers. Online casinos have been offering exciting games for players. Check 온라인 카지노 사이트 리뷰 to find the best online casino sites that are reliable. It will protect the safety and authority of the user.